Balance is in the Contrasts

by Jason on August 6, 2009 · 7 comments

in Bands, Thoughts

This weekend PBS aired “The Sound of Miles Davis”, a 30-minute program from 1959 featuring the Miles Davis Quintet with an orchestra conducted by Davis’ long-time collaborator Gil Evans. I watched this show with my fiance who was asking some questions about the band and the music and what made it so special. I love discussing this kind of stuff with her and I’m always amazed at how well she hears the music, even if she doesn’t know the theory behind it.

At one point she asked me to explain what makes Miles such a genius, which is a huge question, but a dream come true for a jazz trumpet player! Among other things, I talked about the simple elegance of his lines, his yearning tone and his use of space. But one of the biggest things that made Miles a genius was his ability to put together perfectly complimentary bands. He always sought out musicians who were in stark contrast to himself, and in this way he always had balanced and interesting bands.

This got me thinking about my own band. I have been playing with Josh, Evan, and D’Vonne for two years now. They are young cats who are full of fire and desire and are doing things that put them in a class all by themselves. They are out to change the world, do something different, “push the music forward”, as one of them recently said to me. And I think that’s great! That’s one of the reasons I love to play with them. They push me to different places, to try things I wouldn’t otherwise try. And that can be a real thrill.

But I’ve always said that all I want to do is play pretty music that people will enjoy. As a trumpet player, I’m more Chet Baker than Woody Shaw, more early-Miles than late-Miles. I love to play standards and love songs. Melody is important to me. Maybe I’m a sap, or and “old soul”, or a romantic. Call it what you will. I still love to play a melody that people know. Songs that touch us because they are familiar or make us remember a specific moment or day or year.

Just like Miles, who hired Coltrane specifically because he was so different, I have surrounded myself with amazing musicians who are in stark contrast to me. If Miles had found a tenor player that played like he did, his band wouldn’t have been nearly as interesting. And if I had searched out musicians who sound just like I do, there wouldn’t be those contrasting styles that ultimately bring the balance and interest to the band.

Now, I’m no genius. Unlike Miles, who I’m sure knew exactly what he was doing, I did this without really thinking about it. All I tried to do was find the best musicians I could find. But in doing so I have created a band that is interesting. It’s the contrasts that allow us to find balance.

If you haven’t heard the Jason Parker Quartet, you can check out our music here.

{ 6 comments… read them below or add one }

Mack Grout August 6, 2009 at 3:26 pm


Really enjoyed this post man – thanks for being “real” if you know what I mean.

I wanna talk with you to about what you did to put your cd’s together, who you used for what and etc!



Twitter: 1WorkinMusician
August 6, 2009 at 3:39 pm

Thanks Mack! I’d be happy to talk to you about the CD. I found some really great folks to work with. Give me a ring when you have a minute.

Kai Weber
Twitter: fruehlingstag
August 9, 2009 at 1:52 am


your group is really working perfectly well. I “stream-listened” to the new album, and it’s really good! I can really see the tension created by the different musical personalities. Actually, I must say, I usually have quite avantgardist leanings, so the adjective “traditional” in your description of your music as “traditional modern jazz” is not as attractive to me as the second adjective “modern”. Anyway, your combination of “traditional” and “modern” works really well, and I’m sure that’s due to the tension of the different musical personalities in your group. Congratulations!

Twitter: 1WorkinMusician
August 9, 2009 at 12:19 pm

Thanks Kai!

The only reason I use that “Modern Traditional Jazz” tagline is that we play a lot of weddings and that seems to resonate with the brides. If I were just marketing to jazz fans I’d drop the “Traditional” altogether. Although, as you point out, it does describe the sound of the band pretty well.

Kai Weber
Twitter: fruehlingstag
August 9, 2009 at 11:21 pm

Ah, sure, the wedding thing certainly makes sense. I’ve been to a wedding where a jazz band was playing just two weeks ago. They were good musicians, but they had to play very traditional stuff, all the swing standards, you know. The most “modern” thing they had in their repertoire was “Mercy Mercy Mercy” and “Cantaloup Island” 😉 I tried to get some eye-contact with the players occasionally and to initiate some applause, to let them know at least one person is listening.
The really fun thing was that the groom’s father and uncle joined the band on tenor and soprano sax for a jam session. I wonder if you ever have wedding gig where the audience want to join the band?

Twitter: 1WorkinMusician
August 10, 2009 at 5:09 pm

I have definitely been in that position! I try hard to make arrangements for family members sitting in ahead of time, but every once in a while grandpa with a sax slips through and pounces on us! Usually it’s fun, if only because the family eats it up. I’ve even played “rockaroake” wedding where my band was basically the live karaoke machine for the guests. I don’t recommend that for the faint of heart!

Leave a Comment

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: